Trial Begins for Alleged Exploitation of Moroccan Vineyard Workers in France

Three individuals appeared in court in Libourne this Tuesday for the exploitation of Moroccan workers in the vineyards. 25 former Moroccan employees testified against them, denouncing deplorable living conditions and unfulfilled promises of residence permits. The verdict will be handed down on December 17.
The prosecutor requested sentences of up to three years in prison against these employers. The main defendant, a 54-year-old man, and his 42-year-old partner, ran a viticultural service company. They are accused of having exploited the Moroccan workers by providing them with unsanitary housing and not respecting the promised working conditions. A third individual, a 46-year-old Moroccan, is being prosecuted for having served as an intermediary in this system.
The alleged victims claim to have paid between 8,000 and 10,000 euros to come and work in France. In exchange, they were promised a four-month contract paid at minimum wage, housing and a residence permit. The prosecutor denounced a "well-oiled and lucrative system" that exploits the vulnerability of foreign workers by holding out to them "the hope of a better life".
During the hearing, the defendants blamed each other for the recruitment and the sums received. The main defendant denied having received any money, saying: "I didn’t want that. I don’t take money." However, the couple, now unemployed and without declared income, were unable to explain the origin of their 200,000 euros in turnover or the existence of five life insurance contracts.
According to the investigation, the promised employment contracts were never signed, the workers worked up to 62 hours per week without compensation, and no steps were taken to obtain residence permits. "8,000 euros for four months of work, that’s bringing in labor without cost. It’s creating a process to place people in a situation of exploitation and keep them there," said the lawyer for five workers. "In law, this is called human trafficking, and a little further, slavery."
The workers were housed 12 to a small apartment, without enough beds or sanitary facilities. The main defendant disputed these accusations, claiming that the plaintiffs had provided false papers and that they were only seeking a residence permit.
Related Articles
-
Court Upholds Building Permit for Controversial Metz Mosque Project
19 April 2025
-
Fugitive Gunman Sentenced to 15 Years for Besançon Shooting, Linked to Dijon Murder
19 April 2025
-
Police Bust International Bike Theft Ring Spanning France and Morocco
18 April 2025
-
Former French U18 Rugby Manager Questioned in Teen Player’s Disappearance Case
17 April 2025
-
French Agriculture Minister Sparks Controversy Over Ad Changes: Couscous and Diversity Removed
17 April 2025